A narrative review of behavioral tests across mammalian models in neuroscience
Abstract
Mammalian models are widely employed in the research of human diseases. Behavioral tests in animals is a critical evaluative approach in scientific research, offering insights into complex disease pathophysiology and facilitating the assessment of novel therapeutic interventions. Currently, behavioral testing paradigms are extensively applied in mammalian research, particularly in rodent models. Compared to rodents, the brains of large mammals exhibit closer anatomical and biochemical homology to the human brain, thereby endowing them with significant value in neuroscience. Numerous neurological disorders have been successfully used large mammals as models, with the widespread application of behavioral testing methods for these species. This review summarizes established behavioral testing methodologies developed for both small and large mammalian species, and discusses their applications, efficacy, and limitations.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a review, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.
Read the paper
Related studies
- A Survey on Knowledge Graphs: Representation, Acquisition, and Applications
- Toxicity of nanomaterials
- The Human Gene Mutation Database: towards a comprehensive repository of inherited mutation data for medical research, genetic diagnosis and next-generation sequencing studies
- Halogen bonding (X‐bonding): A biological perspective
- Biofilm formation at the air–liquid interface by the Pseudomonas fluorescens SBW25 wrinkly spreader requires an acetylated form of cellulose
- Opioid Activation of Toll-Like Receptor 4 Contributes to Drug Reinforcement
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.