Evidence Hub

Persistent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in an Immunocompromised Host Treated Successfully With the Japanese Herbal Medicine, Mao-to: A Case Report

Yamada T, Sonoda S, Otsuka M, Shirai T, Tateishi T, Furusawa H, Miyazaki Y

The American journal of case reports, 2026

19 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND Persistent COVID-19 in immunocompromised patients, such as those with B-cell depletion or hematologic malignancies, is an important clinical challenge. Clinically, cases that do not respond to guideline-based antivirals, such as molnupiravir, remdesivir, and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, are occasionally encountered, but effective therapeutic alternatives remain scarce. We report a case of persistent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection unresponsive to guideline-based antivirals, for which the traditional Japanese herbal medicine Mao-to (Ma-huang-tang) led to clinical improvement. CASE REPORT A 62-year-old man, who underwent treatment for follicular lymphoma with anti-cluster of differentiation-20 antibody and achieved remission, developed persistent SARS-CoV-2 infection. Despite 1 course of molnupiravir and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir each and multiple courses of remdesivir and corticosteroids each, SARS-CoV-2 infection persisted for over 2 months. Following these treatments, the SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction cycle threshold (Ct) value was 27.6, indicating active COVID-19. Given the lack of further treatment options and clinical stability, Mao-to (Ma-huang-tang), a Japanese herbal medicine ("Kampo"), was then administered as a commercially available extract granule (2.5 g, 3 times daily) for 14 days. The SARS-CoV-2 polymerase Ct value improved to 41, suggesting a marked reduction in viral load, with improved clinical symptoms.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 19 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free