Evidence Hub

Non-Contrast CT Hemorrhage Markers and Outcomes in Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Large Single-Center Cohort from Romania

Cosmin-Nicodim Cîndea, V. Saceleanu, Patrick Canning, C. Roman-Filip, R. Mihaila

Reports, 2025

404 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Early hematoma expansion (HE) is a key driver of poor outcomes, yet readily available non-contrast CT (NCCT) markers remain underused. We assessed four predefined NCCT signs—Blend Sign (BS), Black Hole Sign (BHS), Irregular Shape (IRS), and Satellite Sign (SS)—and a simple composite score (SUM_BBIS, 0–4) for their association with HE and in-hospital mortality. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 404 consecutive adults with primary spontaneous ICH admitted to a tertiary-care center between January 2017 and December 2023. Patients with secondary causes of hemorrhage or without follow-up NCCT were excluded. Each sign was scored dichotomously by blinded readers and summed to form the SUM_BBIS. HE was defined as a >6 mL or >33% volume increase on repeat NCCT within 24–48 h. Outcomes included HE and in-hospital mortality; secondary analyses explored relationships with baseline hematoma volume, location, intraventricular extension (IVH), and comorbidities. Results: Among 404 patients, Irregular Shape was most frequent (62.1%), followed by Satellite Sign (34.9%), Black Hole Sign (31.1%), and Blend Sign (15.3%). Hematoma expansion occurred in 22.0% (89/404). Expansion was more common when ≥1 sign was present, with the Black Hole Sign showing the strongest association (56.2% vs. 23.8%; p < 0.001). In-hospital mortality rose stepwise with higher SUM_BBIS (mean…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 404 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free