Evidence Hub

New acute and chronic black holes in patients with multiple sclerosis randomised to interferon beta-1b or glatiramer acetate

Diego Cadavid, Jerry Cheriyan, Joan Skurnick, John A. Lincoln, Leo J Wolansky, S. D. Cook

Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 2009

75 participants · 48 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hypointense lesions on T1 weighted MRI, referred to as black holes (BH), are a marker of demyelination/axonal loss in multiple sclerosis (MS). There is some evidence that glatiramer acetate (GA) may decrease the conversion of new brain lesions to BH. METHODS: Monthly 3-Tesla brain MRI scans were used for up to 2 years to study the development and evolution of new BH in 75 patients with MS randomised to GA or Interferon beta-1b (IFNbeta1b) in the BECOME study. FINDINGS: Of 1224 newly enhancing lesions (NEL) appearing at baseline through 24 months in 61 patients, 767 (62.7%) showed an acute BH (ABH). The majority of ABH were transient and of similar duration by treatment group. Of 571 ABH in which MRI follow-up scans were available for >or=1 year, 103 (18.8%) were still visible >or=12 months after onset and were considered chronic BH (CBH). Only 12.1% of the 849 NEL with MRI follow-up >or=1 year converted to CBH, 9.8% with IFNbeta1b and 15.2% with GA (p = 0.02). The conversion from ABH to CBH was also lower with IFNbeta1b (15.2%) than with GA (21.4%), of borderline significance (p = 0.06). The majority of patients who developed NEL did not develop CBH; however, about a quarter had conversion rates from ABH to CBH greater than 20%. INTERPRETATION: Only a minority of new brain lesions in patients with MS treated with GA or IFNbeta1b convert to CBH.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 75 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free