Evidence Hub

Infantile achalasia cardia: A rare case report of a 3-month-old female with recurrent pneumonia successfully treated with surgical intervention

Amit Yadav, Prajjwol Luitel, Sujan Paudel, Sadmarg Thakur, Saro Prajapati, D. Koirala

International journal of surgery case reports, 2024

100,000 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Introduction Achalasia, a rare esophageal disorder with an annual incidence of 0.11 per 100,000 in children, is characterized by impaired lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation and peristalsis. Infantile cases are extremely uncommon and often linked to genetic conditions like Allgrove and Down syndrome. Diagnosis is challenging due to overlapping symptoms with other pediatric conditions, relying on barium esophagography and esophageal manometry. Heller myotomy remains the preferred surgical treatment to reduce LES pressure. Case presentation A 3-month-old female presented with a history of cough, feeding difficulties, and regurgitation, accompanied by respiratory distress and recurrent pneumonia. She was diagnosed with achalasia cardia based on clinical findings and contrast-enhanced esophagography. A modified Heller myotomy with Dor-fundoplication was performed successfully, with no postoperative complications. The patient was discharged in stable condition. Discussion Infantile achalasia, a rare condition with unclear etiology, often presents diagnostic challenges. Our early-onset case, lacking syndromic associations, was complicated by recurrent pneumonia, necessitating surgical intervention. The successful outcome after a modified Heller myotomy with Dor-fundoplication supports its efficacy in severe pediatric cases, though long-term monitoring for recurrence is essential. Conclusion Achalasia cardia, though rare in infants, should be considered as differential in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 100,000 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free