Evidence Hub

Re-Challenging with Nivolumab in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma After Immune-Related Interstitial Pneumonia: A Case Report

Y. Shibata, G. Noguchi, Takahisa Suzuki, K. Osaka, S. Umemoto, T. Kishida

The American journal of case reports, 2021

2 citations

Abstract

Patient: Male, 52-year-old Final Diagnosis: Renal cell carcinoma Symptoms: Cough Medication:— Clinical Procedure: — Specialty: Urology Objective: Unusual clinical course Background: The efficacy and safety of re-challenge with immune checkpoint inhibitors after immune-related adverse events have not been established. We report a case of successful re-administration of nivolumab in metastatic renal cell carcinoma after discontinuation due to immune-related adverse events. Case Report: Laparoscopic nephrectomy was performed on a 52-year-old man diagnosed with renal cell carcinoma pT1b-N0M0. After surgery, left adrenal and lung metastases appeared. Nivolumab was administered as a sixth-line therapy, and he achieved a partial response, but interstitial pneumonia occurred. He was diagnosed with grade 2 immune-related adverse events, and nivolumab treatment was discontinued. Interstitial pneumonia was well controlled by steroids. He maintained a partial response for a long time, and the lung metastases disappeared 7 months after discontinuation. However, bilateral lung metastases reappeared 10 months after the discontinuation. We decided to re-administer nivolumab, while carefully monitoring the patient and fully explaining the risk of recurrence of immune-related adverse events. After 5 cycles of re-administration, computed tomography revealed a reduction in metastases without re-activation of interstitial pneumonia. He experienced a grade 1 fever the day after re-administration,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free