Evidence Hub

In Silico Design in Homogeneous Catalysis Using Descriptor Modelling

Enrico Burello, Gadi Rothenberg

International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2006

78 citations

Abstract

This review summarises the state-of-the-art methodologies used for designing homogeneous catalysts and optimising reaction conditions (e.g. choosing the right solvent). We focus on computational techniques that can complement the current advances in high-throughput experimentation, covering the literature in the period 1996-2006. The review assesses the use of molecular modelling tools, from descriptor models based on semiempirical and molecular mechanics calculations, to 2D topological descriptors and graph theory methods. Different techniques are compared based on their computational and time cost, output level, problem relevance and viability. We also review the application of various data mining tools, including artificial neural networks, linear regression, and classification trees. The future of homogeneous catalysis discovery and optimisation is discussed in the light of these developments.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a simulation / modelling, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free