Evidence Hub

Molybdenum-doped iron oxide nanostructures synthesized via a chemical co-precipitation route for efficient dye degradation and antimicrobial performance: in silico molecular docking studies

Tahira Shujah, Anum Shahzadi, Ali Haider, Muhammad Mustajab, Afsah Mobeen Haider, Anwar Ul‐Hamid, Junaid Haider, Walid Nabgan et al.

RSC Advances, 2022

34 citations

Abstract

In this research, various concentrations of molybdenum (2, 4 and 6 wt%) doped Fe3O4 nanostructures (Mo-Fe3O4 NSs) were prepared via a co-precipitation technique. Various techniques were then used to investigate the optical, morphological and structural properties of the NSs in the presence of the dopant materials. X-ray diffraction (XRD) was used to investigate the crystalline nature of the prepared NSs and confirm the orthorhombic and tetragonal structure of Fe3O4, with a decrease in crystallinity and crystallite sizes of 36.11, 38.45, 25.74 and 24.38 nm with increasing concentration of Mo (2, 4 and 6%). Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy analysis was carried out to examine the functional groups in the NSs. Structure, surface morphology and topography were examined via field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM), which confirmed the fabrication of nanoparticles and nanorods and a floccule-like morphology with a higher doping concentration and the interlayer d-spacing was calculated using high-resolution (HR)TEM, the results of which were a good match to the XRD data. The presence of Mo, Fe and O in a lattice of Mo (2, 4 and 6%) doped Fe3O4 was confirmed by energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) analysis. The energy band gap (Eg) was measured via the optical analysis of pure and doped samples, showing a decrease from 2.76 to 2.64 eV. The photoluminescence (PL) spectra exhibit a higher charge combination rate…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a experimental / empirical study, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free