Evidence Hub

Isolation, Crystal Structure, and In Silico Aromatase Inhibition Activity of Ergosta-5, 22-dien-3β-ol from the Fungus Gyromitra esculenta

E. M. Suleimen, Ahmed M. Metwaly, Ahmad E. Mostafa, Eslam B. Elkaeed, Hongwei Liu, Buddha Bahadur Basnet, Raigul N. Suleimen, Margarita Yulaevna Ishmuratova et al.

Journal of Chemistry, 2021

23 citations

Abstract

Ergosterol derivatives exhibited copious promising biological activities. The fungus Gyromitra esculenta is widely distributed in Europe and North America. In order to examine the chemical properties of Gyromitra esculenta, a phytochemical study has been preceded and resulted in the isolation of the steroid, ergosta-5, 22-dien-3β-ol (brassicasterol), from its methanol extract. The complete identification and absolute configuration of the isolated compound have been established by X-ray structural analysis to be (22E, 24R)-24-methylcholesta-5, 22-dien-3beta-ol. The reported cytotoxicity and the great structural similarity of the isolated compound with the cocrystallized ligand of the aromatase enzyme inspired us to run molecular docking studies against that protein. Ergosta-5, 22-dien-3β-ol occupied the target protein with a binding mode almost the same as the cocrystallized ligand and a binding affinity of −33.55 kcal/mol, which was better than that of the cocrystallized ligand (−22.61 kcal/mol). This promising result encouraged us to conduct in silico ADMET and toxicity studies of ergosta-5, 22-dien-3β-ol against 6 models, and the results expected the likeness of the isolated compound to be a drug. In conclusion, ergosta-5, 22-dien-3β-ol has been isolated from Gyromitra esculenta, identified by X-ray structural analysis, and exhibited promising in silico activities against aromatase enzyme.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a simulation / modelling, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free