Evidence Hub

Asymmetric synthesis of enantiopure tetracyclic dispirooxindolopyrrolidine-piperidones via microwave-assisted multicomponent reaction: Crystallographic analysis, antimicrobial activity and in silico studies

H. Jelizi, Amani Toumi, Faiza I. A. Abdella, Ismail Daoud, Sarra Boudriga, Asma K. Alshamari, Tahani Y. A. Alanazi, Ahlam Abdulrahman Alrashdi et al.

Journal of Molecular Structure, 2024

17 citations

Abstract

In an attempt towards the development of new antimicrobials, we synthesized by microwave-assisted multicomponent reaction (MCR) of enantiopure (E,E)-3,5-bisarylidene-N-[(S)-(-)-methylbenzyl]-4-piperidones, isatin and α-amino esters a series of optically active tetracyclic dispirooxindolopyrrolidine-piperidones. The beneficial and promising features of this protocol such as simple operational procedure, short reaction time (10 min), and high product yields (up to 97%) make it an efficient eco-friendly approach offering a powerful mean to expand the structural diversity of spirooxindoles. This approach appears hugely advantageous for high-throughput screening processes in drug discovery research. In addition, crystallographic parameters and inter- and intramolecular interactions occurring in spiropyrrolidine-fused piperidone derivative 4g were examined through single-crystal XRD analysis allowing to determine the absolute configuration of the enantiopure compound. The preliminary biological assessment of their antimicrobial activity indicates that most of the screened products display higher activity than the standard reference drugs Ampicillin and Griseofulvin. Some of them exhibited good to moderate activity against both bacteria and fungi. In addition, in silico molecular docking and predictive ADMET studies for the most active spirocompounds were carried out. Molecular docking confirmed the binding efficacy of candidates 4c and 4l through low score energy values and the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a simulation / modelling, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free