A Randomized, 30-week, Active-controlled, Open-label, 2 Treatment-arm, Parallel Group, Multicenter Study Comparing Efficacy and Safety of iGlarLixi to Insulin Glargine With or Without Metformin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Insufficiently Controlled on Basal Insulin With or Without Oral Antidiabetic Drug(s)
Abstract
Primary Objective:
To demonstrate the superiority of iGlarLixi (fixed ratio combination of insulin glargine and lixisenatide) to insulin glargine on glycemic control as assessed by glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) change in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who are not sufficiently controlled with basal insulin.
Secondary Objectives:
* To assess the effects of iGlarLixi in comparison with insulin glargine
* To assess the safety in each treatment group
Conditions: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
Primary outcome: Change in HbA1c.
Enrollment: 426 participants.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 426 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Metformin as an adjuvant in breast cancer treatment
- Metformin Lysosomal Targeting: A Novel Aspect to Be Investigated for Metformin Repurposing in Neurodegenerative Diseases?
- Aberrant HSF1 signaling activation underlies metformin amelioration of myocardial infarction in mice
- Metformin induces ZFP36 by mTORC1 inhibition in cervical cancer-derived cell lines
- Protein Interaction Network for Identifying Vascular Response of Metformin (Oral Antidiabetic)
- Preventing Long COVID With Metformin
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.