Evidence Hub

Efficacy and Safety of Finerenone in Type 2 Diabetes: A Pooled Analysis of Trials of Heart Failure and Chronic Kidney Disease

Ostrominski JW, Claggett BL, Miao ZM, Filippatos G, Desai AS, Jhund PS, Henderson A, Brinker M et al.

Diabetes care, 2025

8,117 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of finerenone, a nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and either chronic kidney disease (CKD) or heart failure (HF) with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) or preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In this prespecified participant-level pooled analysis of all phase III clinical trials evaluating finerenone versus placebo conducted to date (FINE-HEART), the safety and efficacy of finerenone was evaluated among participants with a history of T2D. Treatment effects on the primary outcome of cardiovascular death and other secondary outcomes were evaluated according to baseline glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and glucose-lowering therapy (GLT) regimen using stratified Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS: Of 18,991 FINE-HEART participants, 15,365 (80.9%) had T2D and available HbA1c at baseline (mean age, 66 ± 10 years; 32% women; mean HbA1c, 7.6 ± 1.4%). The most common GLT regimens were insulin alone (n = 2,652), insulin and metformin (n = 2,005), metformin alone (n = 1,616), metformin and sulfonylurea (n = 1,039), and "other" (n = 8,117), including sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA). Over a median follow-up of 2.9 years, treatment effects of finerenone versus placebo on cardiovascular death were consistent across baseline HbA1c (Pinteraction = 0.75) and GLT regimen…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 8,117 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free