Evidence Hub

Importance of physical evaluation using skeletal muscle mass index and body fat percentage to prevent sarcopenia in elderly Japanese diabetes patients

Fukuoka Y, Narita T, Fujita H, Morii T, Sato T, Sassa MH, Yamada Y

Journal of diabetes investigation, 2019

267 participants

Abstract

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: To investigate the prevalence of sarcopenia, its related factors and indicators of physical evaluation in elderly diabetes patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a cross-sectional observation study. A total of 267 diabetes patients (159 men, 108 women) aged >65 years were recruited in the present study. Skeletal muscle mass index, grip strength and usual gait speed were measured to diagnose sarcopenia according to the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia. Body composition was measured using bioelectrical impedance analysis. Body mass index (BMI) and body fat percentage were evaluated in quartiles to investigate the relationship with sarcopenia. A multiple logistic regression analysis examined sarcopenia-related factors.

RESULTS: The prevalence of sarcopenia in all participants was 18.7% and increased with age. Sarcopenia decreased as BMI increased (P < 0.01, Cochran-Armitage test). In contrast, the third quartile body fat percentage group showed the lowest prevalence of sarcopenia. A strong positive correlation was observed between body mass and skeletal muscle mass indices (R = 0.702-0.682). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that sarcopenia was associated with lower BMI, non-use of metformin and lower bone mineral content in men (P < 0.05), and lower bone mineral content, lower serum levels of albumin and older age in women (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that diabetes patients with a high body fat percentage in addition to…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 267 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free