Evidence Hub

Pasireotide-LAR and pegvisomant combination in resistant acromegaly: a case series of predominantly mammosomatotroph adenomas

Mignone E, Varlamov EV, Pandya R, Hakar M, Fleseriu M

Pituitary, 2026

Abstract

Purpose: Long-term real-world data on concurrent pasireotide-LAR (PAS) and pegvisomant (PEGV) use in treatment-resistant acromegaly remain limited, especially for mammosomatotroph adenomas in younger adults. We report outcomes of six patients treated with this combination at a single tertiary pituitary center.

Methods: IRB-approved retrospective case series. Baseline and follow-up biochemical, radiological, histopathological, treatment and safety outcomes were captured.

Results: Six patients (5 females, 1 male; age 15 to 44 years) with somatotroph (n = 2) or mammosomatotroph (n = 4) adenomas, all macroadenomas, received PAS (20 to 60 mg every 28 days) plus PEGV (60 to 280 mg/week) over a median of 3.3 years (range 0.5 to 5.9) after lack of disease control post-surgery despite multiple lines of medical therapy. All six maintained tumor stability and achieved normal IGF-1. One had biochemical escape after 9 months of biochemical control requiring a 2nd surgery and radiosurgery. One patient discontinued PEGV after 3 years due to injection site pain, 3 patients developed hyperglycemia in the pre-diabetes range; no hepatotoxicity, acute symptomatic biliary disease, or arrhythmias occurred.

Conclusions: In this series of predominantly mammosomatotroph adenomas in younger adults, combination PAS plus PEGV offers potential durable biochemical control, tumor stability and PEGV dose reduction in treatment-resistant acromegaly. Glucose monitoring during treatment is essential as…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free