Evidence Hub

Prophylactic azithromycin for chronic lung allograft dysfunction following lung transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Huang H, Kato T, Imamura Y, Okado S, Nomata Y, Watanabe H, Kawasumi Y, Chen J et al.

Journal of thoracic disease, 2025

Abstract

Background: Azithromycin (AZI) has proven effective in improving pulmonary function and survival in certain patients with established chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) following lung transplantation (LTx), but its prophylactic effects on CLAD remain controversial. This study aimed to assess the outcomes of prophylactic AZI for CLAD following LTx.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted based on PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library. All included studies reported the primary or secondary outcomes in the prophylactic azithromycin (pAZI) and control groups. The CLAD onset, disease-free survival and overall survival (OS) data were pooled using fixed-effect or random-effect models. Sensitivity analysis was employed to evaluate the robustness of the pooled results, while a funnel plot was utilized to assess the publication bias.

Results: Six eligible studies involving 1,251 LTx recipients were included. The pooled analysis revealed a lower risk of CLAD onset in the pAZI group compared to the control group [relative risk (RR) 0.64, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.51-0.81, P<0.001]. Moreover, the pAZI group exhibited superiority in the 3-year [hazard ratio (HR) 0.57, 95% CI: 0.39-0.83, P=0.003] and 5-year CLAD-free survival (HR 0.61, 95% CI: 0.43-0.86, P=0.005); but this superiority was not observed in the 3-year (HR 0.69, 95% CI: 0.31-1.54, P=0.36) and 5-year OS (HR 0.59, 95% CI: 0.30-1.14, P=0.12).

Conclusions: Prophylactic AZI may reduce the risk of CLAD onset and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free