Evidence Hub

Chinese Patent Medicine Shufeng Jiedu Capsules as an Adjuvant Therapy for Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

Xiaowen Zhang, Ruyu Xia, Jiaqi Gao, Jinjun Liu, Jinjun Liu, De-Hao Xu, Xun Li, Xiao-Yang Mio Hu et al.

Frontiers in Pharmacology, 2022

1,840 participants · 22 citations

Abstract

Background: Shufeng Jiedu (SFJD) capsules can be used as adjunctive treatment for patients with community-acquired pneumonia, but the effectiveness and safety of SFJD are not clear. This review aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of SFJD based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods: A systematic review was conducted by searching PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, CENTRAL, CNKI, VIP, CBM, Wanfang and trial registry platforms from their inception to March 2022. Two reviewers screened studies, extracted the data and assessed risk of bias independently. The data were pooled for meta-analysis or presented narratively. Results: Seventeen RCTs involving 1840 participants were included. All trials compared SFJD plus antibiotics to antibiotics, or combined with symptomatic treatment in both groups. The overall certainty of evidence was assessed as moderate to very low certainty. Compared with routine treatment (antibiotics alone or antibiotics plus symptomatic treatment), SFJD plus routine treatment showed beneficial effects in resolution of fever (MD −1.20 days, 95%CI −1.73 to −0.67; 10 RCTs; very low certainty), cough (MD −1.02 days, 95%CI −1.23 to −0.81; 9 RCTs; moderate certainty), phlegm (MD −1.46 days, 95%CI −2.84 to −0.08; 6 RCTs; very low certainty), pulmonary crepitations (MD −1.61 days, 95%CI −2.64 to −0.59; 8 RCTs; low certainty), shortness of breath (MD −2.80 days, 95%CI −2.88 to −2.72; 2 RCTs; low certainty) and chest pain (MD −2.85 days, 95%CI…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,840 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free