Evidence Hub

Effect of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and co-agonists on body composition: Systematic review and network meta-analysis

P. Karakasis, Dimitrios Patoulias, N. Fragakis, Christos S. Mantzoros

Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental, 2024

2,258 participants · 200 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

While glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) effectively reduce body weight, their impact on lean mass remains uncertain. This meta-analysis evaluated the effects of GLP-1RAs and GLP-1/GIP receptor dual agonists (GLP-1/GIP-RAs) on body composition, focusing on total weight, fat mass, and lean mass in adults with diabetes and/or overweight/obesity.

METHODS

A systematic search of Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was conducted through November 12, 2024. Data were analyzed using random-effects pairwise and network meta-analyses to compare interventions with placebo or active comparators.

RESULTS

Twenty-two randomized controlled trials (2258 participants) were included. GLP-1RAs significantly reduced total body weight (MD -3.55 kg, 95 %-CI [-4.81, -2.29]), fat mass (MD -2.95 kg, 95 %-CI [-4.11, -1.79]), and lean mass (MD -0.86 kg, 95 %-CI [-1.30, -0.42]), with lean mass loss comprising approximately 25 % of the total weight loss. However, the relative lean mass, defined as percentage change from baseline, was unaffected. Liraglutide, at 3.0 mg weekly or 1.8 mg daily, was the only GLP-1RA to achieve significant weight reduction without significantly reducing lean mass. Tirzepatide (15 mg weekly) and semaglutide (2.4 mg weekly) were the most effective for weight and fat mass reduction but were among the least effective in preserving lean mass.

CONCLUSIONS

Potent GLP-1 RAs, such as tirzepatide and semaglutide, demonstrate greater overall…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 2,258 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free