Evidence Hub

Glepaglutide, a Long-acting Glucagon-like Peptide-2 Analog, Reduces Parenteral Support in Patients with Short Bowel Syndrome: a Phase 3, Randomized, Controlled Trial

P. Jeppesen, T. Vanuytsel, S. Subramanian, Francisca Joly, G. Wanten, Georg Lamprecht, M. Kunecki, F. Rahman et al.

Gastroenterology, 2024

106 participants · 19 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Glepaglutide is a long-acting GLP-2 analog developed to improve intestinal absorption in short bowel syndrome (SBS) patients. We conducted a trial to establish efficacy and safety of glepaglutide in reducing parenteral support (PS) needs in SBS patients with intestinal failure (IF).

METHODS

In an international, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, phase 3 trial, SBS-IF patients requiring PS ≥3 days/week were randomized 1:1:1 to 24 weeks of glepaglutide 10 mg twice-weekly (TW) or once-weekly (OW), or placebo. PS volume was equivalently reduced if average urine volume of a 48-hour balance period exceeded baseline values by >10%.

RESULTS

106 patients were randomized and dosed. Glepaglutide TW significantly reduced weekly PS volumes from baseline to week 24 versus placebo (mean change of -5.13 vs. -2.85 L/week; P = .0039; primary endpoint). Results were similar across major anatomical subgroups. Glepaglutide TW was also superior to placebo for key secondary endpoints of proportion of patients achieving clinical response defined as ≥20% PS volume reduction from baseline to weeks 20 and 24 (65.7% vs. 38.9%; P = .0243), and patients achieving a reduction in days on PS ≥1 day/week from baseline to week 24 (51.4% vs. 19.4%; P = .0043). Complete PS weaning ("enteral autonomy") was achieved for 5 patients (14%) receiving glepaglutide TW versus 0 for placebo patients. No statistically significant differences were shown for glepaglutide OW…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 106 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free