Evidence Hub

Effectiveness of In-Home, Augmented Reality–Based Telerehabilitation After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Ji-Young Lim, Heeju Yu, Seo Hyun Kim, Jong-In Lee, J. Lim, J. Wang, JiYun Hwang

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, 2024

28 participants · 17 citations

Abstract

Background: New digital technology–based rehabilitation may be a viable option for patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), with advantages such as easy access to treatment and learning as well as cost-effectiveness. Purpose: To investigate the effects of an augmented reality (AR)–based, telerehabilitation system in patients after ACLR compared with a brochure-based rehabilitation program in terms of patient-reported outcomes and functional performance measures. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: This was a multicenter, assessor-blinded study. Enrolled participants were allocated randomly to either the intervention group, who underwent AR-based telerehabilitation system, or to the control group, who underwent a brochure-based rehabilitation program with a self-log. Both groups performed the same postoperative rehabilitation exercise protocol. Subjective knee function was assessed using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) as the primary outcome; secondary outcomes were a numeric rating scale for pain, the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level, isometric knee strength, range of motion, and the single-leg hop test. The intervention group also completed a satisfaction survey. Follow-up was conducted at 2, 6, 12, and 24 weeks postoperatively. Results: A total of 28 patients were enrolled in each group; 1 patient in the control group was lost to follow-up. Patients in both groups demonstrated improvement on all…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 28 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free