Evidence Hub

Efficacy and safety of remimazolam versus dexmedetomidine for patients undergoing flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy: A randomized, clinical trial

Lai-Yin Zhou, Jingcheng Zou, Xue Li, Xiaozhuo Zuo, Mengting Gu, K. Sun, Wen Fan, Yu-Xia Yao et al.

Journal of clinical anesthesia, 2024

363 participants · 21 citations

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Remimazolam's benefits for patients undergoing painless flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy remain uncertain. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of remimazolam and dexmedetomidine in flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FFB).

DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

University hospital.

PATIENTS

Between April 2021 and September 2022, patients undergoing painless flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy were recruited.

INTERVENTIONS

The patients were randomly assigned with a 1:1 ratio to remimazolam-remifentanil group (RR group) or dexmedetomidine-remifentanil group (DR group).

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome was the procedure interruption rate during bronchoscopy. Secondary outcomes were hemodynamic changes, resuscitation time, rescue medication usage rate and dose, satisfaction scores of patients and bronchoscopists, operation-related complications, and adverse events.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 363 patients were included for final analysis. The interruption rates of bronchoscopy were 8.2 % in the RR group and 39.2 % in the DR group (P 0.05) except for postoperative dizziness, which was more common in the DR group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Remimazolam is effective and safe in painless flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy. It allows a lower procedure interruption rate and incidence of oxygen desaturation, providing better hemodynamic stability compared to dexmedetomidine.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 363 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free