Evidence Hub

The Efficacy of Tradipitant in Patients with Diabetic and Idiopathic Gastroparesis in Phase III Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial

J. Carlin, C. Polymeropoulos, Michael Camilleri, Anthony Lembo, M. Fisher, Caleigh Kupersmith, Darby Madonick, Paula Moszczynski et al.

Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2024

201 participants · 20 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Neurokinin receptor 1 (NK1R) antagonists are effective in reducing nausea and vomiting in chemo-therapy induced emesis. We investigated the safety and efficacy of tradipitant, an NK1R antagonist, in patients with idiopathic and diabetic gastroparesis.

METHODS

201 adults with gastroparesis were randomly assigned to oral tradipitant 85 mg (n = 102) or placebo (n = 99) twice daily for 12 weeks. Symptoms were assessed by a daily symptom dairy, Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index scores, and other patient-reported questionnaires. Blood levels were monitored for an exposure-response analysis. The primary outcome was change from baseline to week 12 in average nausea severity, measured by daily symptom diary.

RESULTS

The ITT population did not meet the pre-specified primary endpoint at Week 12 (difference in nausea severity change drug vs. placebo, P = .741) or pre-specified secondary endpoints. Post hoc analyses were performed to control for drug exposure, rescue medications, and baseline severity inflation. Subjects with high blood levels of tradipitant significantly improved average nausea severity beginning at early time points Weeks 2 through Week 4. In post hoc sensitivity analyses, tradipitant treatment demonstrated strengthened effects, with statistically significant improvements in nausea at Week 12.

CONCLUSIONS

Although tradipitant did not reach significance in the ITT population, a pharmacokinetic exposure-response analysis demonstrated significant effects…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 201 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free