Evidence Hub

Clinical Response to Resynchronization Therapy: Conduction System Pacing vs Biventricular Pacing. CONSYST-CRT trial

M. Pujol-López, F. Graterol, R. Borrás, C. Garcia-Ribas, J. Guichard, M. Regany-Closa, R. Jiménez-Arjona, M. Niebla et al.

JACC Clinical Electrophysiology, 2025

35 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Randomized studies comparing conduction system pacing (CSP) with biventricular pacing (BiVP) are scarce and do not include clinical outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

The CONSYST-CRT (Conduction System Pacing vs Biventricular Resynchronization Therapy in Systolic Dysfunction and Wide QRS) trial aimed to test the noninferiority of CSP as compared with BiVP in patients with an indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy, with respect to a combined clinical endpoint at 1-year follow-up.

METHODS

CONSYST-CRT is a randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial (NCT05187611). One hundred thirty-four patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy indication were randomized to BiVP or CSP and followed up for 12 months. Crossover was allowed when the primary allocation procedure failed. The atrioventricular interval was optimized to obtain fusion with intrinsic conduction. The primary combined endpoint was all-cause mortality, cardiac transplant, heart failure hospitalization, or left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improvement <5 points at 12 months. Secondary endpoints were LVEF increase, LV end-systolic volume (LVESV) decrease, echocardiographic response (≥15% LVESV decrease), QRS shortening, septal flash correction, NYHA functional class improvement, and a combined endpoint of all-cause mortality, cardiac transplantation, and heart failure hospitalization.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients were allocated to each group. Eighteen patients (26.9%) crossed from CSP to BiVP; 5 (7.5%)…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free