Evidence Hub

Steatotic liver disease predicts cardiovascular disease and advanced liver fibrosis: A community-dwelling cohort study with 20-year follow-up

Hun-Jee Choe, Joon Ho Moon, Won Kim, B. Koo, Nam H. Cho

Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental, 2024

9,497 participants · 76 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Steatotic liver disease (SLD) has emerged as new nomenclature to increase awareness and reflect the pathophysiology of the disease better. We investigated the risk of advanced fibrosis and cardiovascular disease (CVD) in SLD using data derived from a Korean prospective cohort.

METHODS

We defined SLD using the fatty liver index (FLI) and identified advanced fibrosis with the age-adjusted Fibrosis-4 Index. SLD was further subcategorized into metabolic dysfunction-associated SLD (MASLD), MASLD with increased alcohol intake (MetALD), and alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD).

FINDINGS

The Ansung-Ansan cohort of the Korean Genome and Epidemiology study, following 9497 participants from 2002 to 2020, included 3642 (38.3 %) with MASLD, 424 (4.5 %) with MetALD, and 207 (2.1 %) with ALD. During the median follow-up of 17.5 years, CVD risk was higher in those with MASLD (hazard ratio [HR], 1.27; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.12-1.45; P < 0.001), MetALD (HR, 1.88; 95%CI, 1.33-2.65; P < 0.001), and ALD (HR, 1.95; 95%CI, 1.01-3.77; P < 0.001) than in those without SLD, after adjusting for conventional risk factors. Notably, the CVD risk was higher in the MetALD than in the MASLD group (P = 0.027). In the MASLD group, the number of cardiometabolic risk factors (CMRFs) correlated positively with CVD risk (HR, 1.34; 95%CI, 1.24-1.45; P < 0.001 for trend). Among the CMRFs, hypertension (HR, 1.94; 95%CI, 1.63-2.31; P < 0.001) was the predominant contributor to CVD. The MASLD…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 9,497 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free