Evidence Hub

Impact of disease-modifying therapies on pregnancy outcomes in multiple sclerosis: a prospective cohort study from the German multiple sclerosis and pregnancy registry

Nadine Bast, Karen Dost-Kovalsky, Sabrina Haben, Natalia Friedmann, Laura Witt, T. Oganowski, Ralf Gold, S. Thiel et al.

The Lancet Regional Health - Europe, 2024

28 citations

Abstract

Summary Background In recent decades, relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) became more treatable through new disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). Identifying safe treatments with minimal fetal risks for family planning is needed. Methods In this prospective cohort from the German MS and Pregnancy Registry (DMSKW), we analyzed pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in MS-patients using descriptive statistics and logistic/linear regression models to compare DMT-exposed pregnancies to DMT-unexposed pregnancies. Findings In 2885 DMT-exposed and 837 DMT-unexposed pregnancies, exposure was not associated with spontaneous abortions, preterm births or major congenital anomalies (MCAs). Severe infections were rare, but more frequent in the Fumarates-group (11/395: 2.8% vs. 8/837 unexposed-group: 1.0%, p-value: 0.03). Antibiotic-use was associated with 2nd-trimester (OR: 2.47, CI: 1.47, 4.05, p-value: <0.001), 3rd-trimester Natalizumab-exposure (OR: 1.75, CI: 1.15, 2.63, p-value: 0.01), and anti-CD20-exposure (OR: 2.16, CI: 1.41, 3.29, p-value: <0.001). Birthweight was significantly reduced in the Sphingosine-1-phosphate-group (β: −132 g, CI: −205, −60, p-value: <0.001), and 3rd-trimester Natalizumab-subgroup (β: −74 g, CI: −138, −9.4, p-value: 0.02). Small for gestational age (SGA) neonates were common in the Sphingosine-1-phospate- (OR: 1.65, CI: 1.07, 2.50, p-value: 0.02) and anti-CD20-group (OR: 1.54, CI: 1.01, 2.32, p-value: 0.04), and also the entire cohort (651/3459: 18.8%),…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free