Evidence Hub

Cognitive reserve types and depressive symptoms development in late-life: A population-based cohort study

F. Triolo, G. Grande, I. Ekström, E. J. Laukka, Stefan Fors, A. Marseglia, S. Dekhtyar

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior, 2025

2,709 participants · 4 citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Cognitive reserve (CR) describes individual differences in susceptibility to brain damage that translates into varying dementia onsets and may also influence the occurrence of depressive symptoms. Within a population-based cohort of older people, we investigated two operationalizations of CR, residual- and activity-based approaches, in their association with the development of depressive symptoms.

METHODS

We analyzed longitudinal data on 402 dementia- and depression-free adults aged 60+ from the Swedish National Study on Aging and Care in Kungsholmen (SNAC-K) who underwent brain MRI at baseline. Residual-based reserve was derived by regressing episodic memory on a brain-integrity index incorporating six structural MRI markers. Activity-based reserve factored lifelong CR-enhancing experiences, including education, work complexity, social network, and leisure activities. Clinically relevant depressive symptoms were defined as a Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale score >6. Cox hazard models were used to explore the association between both residual- and activity-based CR measures (categorized in tertiles) and incidence of depressive symptoms over a 15-year follow-up, while accounting for sociodemographic, clinical, behavioral factors, and brain integrity. Analyses for the activity-based measure were replicated in the full SNAC-K sample (N = 2709), further exploring depression diagnosis as additional outcome.

RESULTS

Compared to low levels, higher levels of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 2,709 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free