Evidence Hub

Staged management of severe polytrauma with pericardial and diaphragmatic rupture and open pelvic ring injury: a case report with literature review

Peng Ye, Xian-Gui Zhou, Shu-Hong Wang, Cui Yang, Guang-Li Yang, A. Yu

International journal of surgery case reports, 2026

1 citation

Abstract

Introduction High-energy polytrauma demands decisive, parallel actions within a narrow window. Using an integrated Emergency Medical Services System, we enabled unified coordination for synchronous damage-control surgery (DCS) and report a representative case with lessons. Case presentation A 60-year-old woman run over by a truck arrived 4 hours after injury in decompensated hemorrhagic shock (pH 7.03, base excess −9.4 mmol/L, lactate 6.4 mmol/L on norepinephrine) with positive extended focused assessment with sonography for trauma, evisceration with heavy perineal contamination, and extensive lower-limb degloving. computed tomography showed left diaphragmatic and probable pericardial rupture, active hepatic bleeding, an open pelvic ring, and additional fractures. Under integrated team leadership, three teams performed synchronous, life-threatening-prioritized DCS: laparotomy with repair of the pericardium and diaphragm; small bowel resection with primary anastomosis; hemorrhage control via bilateral internal iliac artery ligation and hepatic hemostasis; wide debridement with negative-pressure wound therapy; and left hip disarticulation. Despite initial stabilization in the emergency ICU, she developed severe acute respiratory distress syndrome, septic shock from persistent contamination, and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, resulting in death. Discussion Synchronous multiteam surgery within an integrated system shortened time to hemostasis and contamination control and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free