Evidence Hub

Presentation, management and outcome of thoracic trauma in a resource-limited environment: A case series

D. Benjamin, Patrick Charlorin, Gérald Jonacé, Jude Milcé

Trauma Case Reports, 2025

35 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background Trauma is a major public health problem, causing the death of >5 million people each year. One-fifth of these deaths are related to thoracic trauma (TT). This study aims to provide data on the presentation, management, and outcome of TT at the State University Hospital of Haiti (HUEH). Methods This is a retrospective, single-center, formal case series of 35 cases of TT admitted to the General Surgery Department of HUEH from January 2013 to December 2017. Data analyzed included sociodemographic, preoperative (etiology and clinical presentation), management, and outcomes. The Exact Fischer, Welch and Mann-Whitney U tests were used. A P-value p < 0.05 was considered significant. The case series was reported according to PROCESS criteria. Results Of our sample of 35 patients, there was a male predominance (n = 27, 77.1 %), and the median age was 40 years. Most patients (n = 33, 94.3 %) presented with penetrating TT. The principal etiology was assaults (n = 30, 85.7 %), committed mostly by strangers (n = 19) and mainly with firearms (n = 18). Topping the list of common thoracic injuries were hemopneumothorax, diaphragmatic tear and open pneumothorax. There were extrathoracic associated injuries in 16 patients (45.7 %) with abdominal involvement in 10 cases (28.6 %). Principal specific management was tube thoracostomy for 33 patients (94.3 %) with additional laparotomy for 12 patients (34.3 %) for a median hospital stay of 6 days. There were 2 deaths due to massive…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 35 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free