Evidence Hub

The use of Sirolimus for an unresectable and refractory venous malformation: A case series

D. K. Carolino, Keiichi Muramatsu, Yasuhiro Tani, Hideaki Sugimoto, Masaya Ueda

Radiology Case Reports, 2025

3 citations

Abstract

Vascular malformations (VM) may become symptomatic and extensive, leading to deranged coagulation and bleeding. Sirolimus®, an antiangiogenic agent, has recently emerged as treatment for VM. We report its short-term outcomes for VMs of the extremities. Case 1: A 47-year-old female reported left forearm pain. MRI confirmed a VM. Lesion shrinkage and pain relief were not achieved despite sclerotherapy. After 5 months on Sirolimus®, improved pain, decreased forearm circumference and decreased lesion size on MRI were observed. Case 2: 62-year-old male reported left knee pain. MRI and biopsy confirmed a VM. After 3 months on Sirolimus®, improved pain, decreased leg circumference, and decreased lesion size on MRI were observed. Our series demonstrates that Sirolimus® is efficacious in downsizing VMs with resultant symptom relief in the short-term. Other series has likewise shown effectivity in extensive and refractory lesions, with benefits outweighing side effects.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free