Evidence Hub

Pulmonary vein stenosis requiring angioplasty or surgical treatment following pulmonary vein isolation: case series

Haruka Iwama, M. Kamioka, Hiroaki Watanabe, Yukako Ogoyama, Tomonori Watanabe, K. Kario

European Heart Journal: Case Reports, 2025

3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Pulmonary vein stenosis (PVS) after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is a rare but severe complication. Its severity depends on the cause, number of stenosed veins, and symptoms. For symptomatic patients, angioplasty is the first choice, while surgery is not recommended due to its high invasiveness. Case summary Patient 1: A 60-year-old male developed symptomatic left superior and inferior PVS after two procedures of PVI using radiofrequency energy. Eight-millimetre stent in left-superior and 7-mm stent in left-inferior PV were placed. Patient 2: A 64-year-old male underwent PVI using radiofrequency energy with a high-power short-duration setting. Although the patient was asymptomatic, CT revealed left-inferior PVS along with infiltrative shadow of the same area. Considering the risk of pulmonary infarction and with the patient’s informed consent, a 7-mm diameter stent was placed. Patient 3: A 56-year-old male underwent PVI with a 28-mm cryoballoon, followed by radiofrequency ablation for bilateral inferior PV reconductions. Subsequently, he developed severe left-inferior PVS, uncontrollable haemoptysis, and pulmonary infarction, necessitating lower lung-lobe resection. Discussion Classical PVS often results from multiple radiofrequency ablations, as seen in Patients 1 and 3. High-power short-duration ablation, as a novel technique associated with specific risks, should also be acknowledged. While PVS treatment is typically for symptomatic cases, it may be…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free