Evidence Hub

Giant coronary artery aneurysms: a case series and management recommendations

A. S. Vink, M. Grundeken, B. Straver, D. Robbers-Visser, B. Bouma, D. Koolbergen, R. D. de Winter, M. Beijk

European Heart Journal: Case Reports, 2025

3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Coronary artery aneurysms (CAAs) are a rare clinical entity, and little is known about their natural history, prognosis, and management. Invasive management of patients with CAA is challenging not only because of this limited understanding but also due to the technical challenges associated with both percutaneous and surgical interventions. Case summary We describe the management of seven cases with giant CAAs in an elective setting. Our first case demonstrates successful percutaneous closure of a giant right coronary aneurysm in an asymptomatic patient using an Amplatzer™ Vascular Plug. In four cases, surgery was performed, due to the presence of symptoms and/or when revascularization by a percutaneous intervention was considered to be unsuitable. Two cases were managed conservatively due to the patients’ advanced age and significant comorbidities. Discussion Although most published cases of giant CAAs involve elective surgical treatment, growing expertise shows that percutaneous intervention is a viable and increasingly promising alternative—particularly in younger patients or those at high surgical risk. Based on the limited available evidence and our own experience, we propose a practical management algorithm to help guide multidisciplinary decision-making. This emphasizes that percutaneous treatment should be actively considered as part of a tailored, patient-specific strategy in the management of giant CAAs.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free