Evidence Hub

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy in managing fingertip injury after the thenar and V—Y flap procedure: A case series

M. H. Oley, M. Oley, A. D. Noersasongko, Yudhaputra Setiadhi, Vania Sukarno, M. Faruk

International journal of surgery case reports, 2025

2 citations

Abstract

Introduction Injuries to fingertips are common due to their critical role in tactile sensation and hand function. Management options depend on injury severity and include conservative care, skin grafts, or flaps. The Ishikawa classification system helps guide treatment by categorizing injuries from soft tissue damage (Type I) to more severe bone and tissue loss (Type IV). Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) has emerged as a valuable adjunct in enhancing wound healing and graft survival. Case presentation This report discusses five patients with fingertip injuries (FTI) of varying degrees, ranging from mechanical traumas to accidents involving parasailing and firecrackers. Their injuries were classified as Type II (n = 1), III (n = 2), and Type IV (n = 2) according to the Ishikawa system. Surgical interventions included thenar flaps for radial digit injuries in two patients and V—Y advancement flaps with full-thickness skin grafts in the other three. The grafts were harvested from the plantar foot. Following surgery, each patient underwent five HBOT sessions to support healing. Clinical discussion The study observed that all five patients who underwent HBOT after surgical procedures experienced optimal graft healing. There were no signs of dehiscence, indicating that the grafts were well-integrated and functioning effectively. This outcome is attributed to the positive effects of HBOT on wound healing. Conclusion HBOT accelerates wound healing, improves graft survival, and helps…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free