Evidence Hub

Clinical impact of high-dose esomeprazole-amoxicillin dual therapy as rescue treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Khan I, Ansab M, Nadeem A, Aslam F, Shadab HA, Sawaira F, Alokozay E, Naseer F et al.

Gut pathogens, 2026

1,230 participants

Abstract

Background: Helicobacter pylori infection, linked to peptic ulcer disease and gastric cancer, faces declining eradication rates due to antibiotic resistance. High-dose esomeprazole-amoxicillin dual therapy (HDDT) is a promising rescue regimen, but its efficacy and safety compared to standard therapies remain unclear.

Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis, adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, included four randomized controlled trials (n = 1,230) that compared HDDT with standard regimens. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched through April 2025. Outcomes included eradication rates, compliance, and adverse events. A meta-analysis was conducted using the inverse variance method, with heterogeneity assessed via I² statistics.

Results: HDDT showed no significant difference in eradication rates (RR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.89-1.08, P = 0.6438) or compliance (RR = 1.04, 95% CI: 0.97 to 1.12, P = 0.2522) compared to standard therapies. However, HDDT significantly reduced overall adverse events (RR = 0.28, 95% CI: 0.18-0.44, P < 0.0001), including nausea, headache, fatigue, dysgeusia, bloating, and abdominal pain. No significant differences were observed for serious adverse events, diarrhea, dizziness, decreased appetite, constipation, or skin rash. Heterogeneity varied across the outcomes.

Conclusion: HDDT is as effective as standard regimens for H. pylori rescue treatment, with a superior…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,230 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free