Evidence Hub

Mechanical Thrombectomy for N-butyl-2 Cyanoacrylate Cerebral Embolism via Portopulmonary Venous Anastomosis Following Endoscopic Injection Sclerotherapy: A Case Report

Ichiro Maeda, T. Imahori, Shigeru Miyake, Hiroki Goto, Rikuo Nishii, Haruka Enami, Daisuke Yamamoto, S. Nakayasu et al.

NMC Case Report Journal, 2025

3 citations

Abstract

Cerebral embolism following endoscopic injection sclerotherapy using N-butyl-2 cyanoacrylate for esophagogastric varices is a rare but serious complication. This condition occurs due to the migration of N-butyl-2 cyanoacrylate into the cerebral circulation, which has traditionally been attributed to paradoxical embolism via a patent foramen ovale. However, recent reports have suggested the possibility of alternative embolic pathways. We report the case of a 76-year-old woman who presented with acute gastric variceal bleeding and underwent endoscopic injection sclerotherapy using N-butyl-2 cyanoacrylate and Lipiodol. Shortly after the procedure, the patient developed global aphasia and right hemiparesis. Head computed tomography revealed scattered ultra-hyperdense materials and magnetic resonance imaging confirmed left middle cerebral artery M2 occlusion. Mechanical thrombectomy was performed, achieving successful recanalization and neurological improvement. Imaging findings and histopathological analysis of the retrieved thrombus strongly supported the diagnosis of N-butyl-2 cyanoacrylate embolism. Retrospective evaluation of preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography identified a portopulmonary venous anastomosis, a right-to-left shunt connecting gastric varices to the pulmonary veins. This anastomosis is a collateral pathway associated with portal hypertension. This case suggests that even in the absence of a patent foramen ovale, portopulmonary venous anastomosis…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free