Evidence Hub

Pediatric Triptan-induced Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome with Both Hemorrhagic and Ischemic Stroke: Case Report and Literature Review

Yotaro Okazaki, Satoshi Hori, Ryosuke Takagi, Taishi Nakamura, M. Ohtake, Hidetaka Onodera, Takashi Kawasaki, Katsumi Sakata et al.

NMC Case Report Journal, 2025

1 citation

Abstract

Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome is characterized by severe headaches and diffuse, segmental constriction of cerebral arteries. We report a rare pediatric case of triptan-induced reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome, complicated by both subarachnoid hemorrhage and cerebral infarction. A 10-year-old boy presented with persistent severe headaches initially suspected to be migraines, for which he was prescribed rizatriptan. Five days after starting rizatriptan, he developed impaired consciousness (Japan Coma Scale 10) and partial right-sided hemiparesis, prompting emergency hospitalization. A head computed tomography scan revealed subarachnoid hemorrhage in the left frontal cortical region. Cerebral angiography showed stenotic changes in the internal carotid artery, middle cerebral artery, anterior cerebral artery, and posterior cerebral artery. Suspecting triptan-induced reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome, rizatriptan was discontinued, and verapamil treatment was initiated. Subsequent magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance angiography revealed cerebral infarction in the right cerebellum, left middle cerebral artery territory, and right occipital lobe, with persistent stenotic changes from earlier findings. Edaravone was added to the treatment regimen. The patient's condition gradually improved, and follow-up magnetic resonance angiography showed almost complete resolution of the prior stenotic changes. His partial right-sided…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free