Evidence Hub

Hybrid Endovascular and Direct Surgical Approach for Treatment of Penetrating Common Carotid Artery Injury: A Case Report

D. Uzuki, Ryo Hiruta, Takao Kojima, Y. Naruse, J. Sakuma, Hiroharu Shinjo, Takashi Igarashi, Masazumi Fujii

NMC Case Report Journal, 2024

2 citations

Abstract

Although rare, penetrating cervical vascular injury poses significant challenges with a poor patient prognosis, often attributed to severe hemorrhage and accompanying injuries. We encountered a case of hemorrhagic shock resulting from a penetrating injury to the common carotid artery (CCA), which was successfully managed using a combination of endovascular therapy and direct surgical intervention. A 23-year-old man presented with a self-inflicted stab wound on the left side of his neck from a kitchen knife. This injury resulted in hemorrhagic shock and coma. Initial management included fluid resuscitation and transfusion, with continuous manual compression to control profuse bleeding. Contrast-enhanced neck and brain computed tomography (CT) showed a left CCA injury that was challenging to directly address due to its low anatomical location and continuous bleeding. Neurosurgeons initiated endovascular treatment by placing a guiding balloon catheter proximal to the left CCA for occlusion. Despite this, pulsatile bleeding persisted, prompting the distal placement of a balloon catheter to achieve better bleeding control. Cardiovascular surgeons then performed direct surgery, clearly identifying damage to the anterior and posterior walls of the CCA. The repair involved the use of a self-made cylindrical bovine pericardial patch, which resulted in successful revascularization. Following surgery, the patient regained independent mobility and was discharged. This case emphasizes…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free