Evidence Hub

Thoracic Intra and Extramedullary Capillary Hemangioma with Subacute Clinical Course: A Case Report and Literature Review

Yumeki Yamamoto, Hiroya Shimauchi-Ohtaki, Fumiaki Honda, Takahiro Shirakura, Keigo Aramaki, Ryosuke Shintoku, T. Miyagishima, M. Aihara et al.

NMC Case Report Journal, 2024

5 citations

Abstract

Capillary hemangiomas are benign tumors comprising a lobulated proliferation of capillary vessels frequently located in the soft tissues of the neck and head. Spinal intradural capillary hemangiomas are rare, particularly intramedullary lesions. To our knowledge, only 31 cases of spinal intramedullary capillary hemangiomas have been reported. Here, we describe a rare case of a thoracic capillary hemangioma comprising extramedullary and intramedullary components. A 51-year-old male patient presented with bilateral lower extremity numbness and subsequent paraparesis, sensory disturbance, and bladder-bowel dysfunction with a subacute clinical course. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a mass lesion with intramedullary and intradural extramedullary components at the Th9-10 vertebrae level and widespread spinal cord edema. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed abnormal vessels on the dorsal spinal cord surface. Spinal angiography revealed a light-stained mass lesion fed by the radiculopial artery from the right Th11 intercostal artery. The tumor was resected en bloc, and the histological diagnosis was a capillary hemangioma. Postoperatively, the spinal cord edema diminished, and the patient was discharged from the convalescent rehabilitation ward. Although intramedullary capillary hemangioma is a rare spinal tumor and its preoperative diagnosis is difficult, it should be considered in the differential diagnosis of spinal intramedullary tumors.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free