Evidence Hub

Gut microbiota in patients with sarcopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Guang Wang, Yu-Jie Li, Hui-Song Liu, Xinjuan Yu

Frontiers in Microbiology, 2025

26 citations

Abstract

Background Intestinal dysbiosis was considered a pivotal pathological mechanism underlying sarcopenia. Despite the fervor surrounding research in this domain, substantial controversy persists regarding the obtained outcomes. Objective To systematically summarized the disparities in gut microbiota composition between the group afflicted by sarcopenia and non-sarcopenia controls. Methods PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholer, Cochrane Library and gray literature sources were systematically searched for in randomized controlled trials. Meta-analysis and random-effects meta-regression were conducted using Rev. Man 5.3. Overall effect was measured using Hedges’s g and determined using Z-statistics. Cochran’s Q test and I2 were used to investigate heterogeneity. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess overall quality of evidence. Results Ten studies, including 421 cases of sarcopenia and 1,642 cases of controls, were included in the meta-analysis. Patients with sarcopenia showed significantly reduced gut microbiota in α diversity, and β diversity was significantly different in 8/9 of included studies. We also found more abundance of phylum Proteobacteria and genus Escherichia-Shigella, and less abundance of phylum Firmicutes and genus Faecalibacterium, Prevotella 9, Blautia in the sarcopenia group. Conclusion The gut microbiota composition in patients with sarcopenia has undergone alterations, serving as a fundamental reference for…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free