Evidence Hub

Assessment of periodontal health status in patients with Parkinson's disease-A systematic review and meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies

Krishna R. Suryawanshi, S. Martande, Darshan N. Kalal, Swathi Pv, D. Gopalakrishnan, Anita Kulloli, Sharath Shetty, Shambhavi Thakur et al.

Special Care in Dentistry: managing special patients, settings, and situations, 2024

6 citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Parkinson's disease (PKD) is neurodegenerative disorder marked by tremors, bradykinesia, muscle rigidity and reduction in precise hand movements which could lead to improper oral hygiene and Periodontal disease. Current systematic review aims to review existing literature and provide assessment of periodontal health in PKD patients through a meta-analysis METHODS: Review was performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines and registered in PROSPERO-CRD42023451700. Databases were searched for studies having sufficient data on periodontal health in patients with PKD compared to healthy controls and reporting outcomes in terms of various periodontal parameters of probing depth (PD), plaque index (PI), clinical attachment level (CAL), presence of bleeding on probing and gingivitis. Quality assessment of included was evaluated using Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS).

RESULTS

Eleven studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria, of which ten studies were suitable for meta-analysis. Pooled estimate through the SMD showed that all periodontal parameters were altered and significantly deteriorated in PKD compared to controls but this group differences were statistically insignificant (p > 0.05). Publication bias through the funnel plot showed symmetric distribution with absence of systematic heterogeneity.

CONCLUSION

Parkinson's disease could be a possible factor in deterioration of periodontal health.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free