Evidence Hub

Incidence and predictors of hypocalcemia in end-stage renal disease patients on denosumab therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abdul Hannan Siddiqui, Misbah Shaikh, Afia Salman, M. Fahim, Fizzah Batool, Tahreem Mari, Sarah C. Musani, M. Fareed et al.

World Journal of Meta-Analysis, 2024

3,240 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Denosumab inhibits the receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-ligand. It markedly increases bone mineral density and has been proven to reduce the risk of fractures. However, numerous adverse effects, notably hypocalcemia, are prevalent in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD).

AIM

To analyze the incidence and predictors of hypocalcemia caused by denosumab compared to control in patients with ESRD.

METHODS

We conducted this study in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Central, and EMBASE were systematically searched from inception through March 2024. All original studies investigating the effects of denosumab on patients with ESRD compared to control were extracted. The primary outcomes of our study were the incidence of mild, severe, and very severe hypocalcemia. Secondary outcomes included serum levels of intact parathyroid hormone, calcium, and phosphate. The results were pooled and analyzed using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Seven articles comprising 3240 patients were included in our study. Patients treated with denosumab had a significantly increased incidence of mild hypocalcemia [risk ratio (RR): 2.79; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.99-7.91; P = 0.05; I ² = 37%] and of very severe hypocalcemia (RR: 9.58; 95%CI: 1.58-57.98; P = 0.01; I ² = 49%). However, an increase in the occurrence of severe hypocalcemia was non-significant (RR: 4.23; 95%CI: 0.47-38.34;…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 3,240 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free