Evidence Hub

Prevalence and Risk Factors of Fluoroquinolone Resistance in Major Bacterial Pathogens: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Anggriawan IMB, Rochmawati ID

International journal of microbiology, 2026

2 citations

Abstract

Background: The widespread use of fluoroquinolones for the treatment of Gram-negative bacterial infections has contributed to the rising prevalence of antimicrobial resistance. However, limited studies have systematically analyzed the prevalence of fluoroquinolone resistance (FQR) and its associated risk factors.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted, screening studies published between January 1, 2014, and October 31, 2024, from the PubMed, Medline, Embase, and CINAHL databases. Studies were included based on the following criteria: observational designs, evaluation of Gram-negative bacteria for FQR in human subjects, and investigation of FQR and associated risk factors. Data analysis, including pooled prevalence estimation and odds ratio calculation, was performed using R Studio (Version 4.2.3) with the metafor package. Heterogeneity among studies was assessed using Q and I 2 statistics. A funnel plot was used to assess potential publication bias among the included studies.

Results: A total of 24 studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of FQR across pathogens was 35% (95% CI: 30%-40%), with species-specific rates of Campylobacter spp. (49%), Escherichia coli (35%), Klebsiella spp. (23%), Mycobacterium tuberculosis (40%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (34%), Proteus spp. (45%), and others (26%). Subgroup analyses showed variation by fluoroquinolone generation and year of publication, with E. coli displaying…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free