Evidence Hub

Effects of remdesivir in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: Systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized trials

A. Amstutz, B. Speich, F. Mentré, C. Rueegg, D. Belhadi, L. Assoumou, C. Burdet, S. Murthy et al.

The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, 2023

662 participants · 83 citations

Abstract

Background: The interpretation of the evidence from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on remdesivir for hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is conflicting. We conducted a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis (IPDMA) of RCTs to assess the benefits and harms of remdesivir compared to placebo or usual care in hospitalized patients and whether treatment effects differed between prespecified subgroups. Methods: We systematically searched electronic databases and registries through April 11th 2022 and contacted authors of eligible trials to share individual patient data. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at day 28. We used multivariable hierarchical regression adjusting for respiratory support, age, and enrollment period to investigate effect modifiers. This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021257134). Findings: Out of nine eligible RCTs, eight provided individual data for 10480 hospitalized COVID-19 patients (99% of total randomized patients globally) recruited between February 2020 and April 2021. Within 28 days of randomization, 662 of 5317 patients (12.5%) assigned to remdesivir and 706 of 5005 (14.1%) assigned to no remdesivir died (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78-1.00; p=0.045 in the multiple imputation set / aOR 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79-1.00; p=0.059 in the complete case set). We found evidence for a credible subgroup effect according to respiratory support…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 662 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free