Evidence Hub

Behavioural and physiological effects of binge eating: a systematic review and meta-analysis of animal models

Simone Rehn, Joël Raymond, Robert A. Boakes, Michael D. Kendig, C. Leenaars

Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 2025

4 citations

Abstract

Binge eating is defined as eating abnormally large amounts in a brief period of time. Many animal studies have examined the behavioural and physiological effects of binge eating of high-fat, high-sugar foods to model the consequences of human binge eating. The present systematic review of 199 rodent studies sought to identify the behavioural and physiological consequences of binge eating and determine whether changes were specific to binge eating or to general effects of exposure to a palatable diet. A meta-analysis of 18 rodent studies revealed that binge eating produces greater anxiety-like behaviour on the Elevated Plus-Maze with a small effect size and significant funnel plot asymmetry, suggesting that the true effect size is overestimated. A history of binge-like access generally increases progressive ratio breakpoint for the binged food, without altering 'liking' as measured by lick microstructure, suggesting that dissociable effects on 'wanting' but not 'liking' accompany binge eating behaviour and contribute to its persistence. Binge eating appears to enhance compulsive food-seeking behaviour and prevent stress-induced reductions in intake but does not appear to alter depression-like behaviour or locomotor activity. Notably, binge eating may produce comparable metabolic impairments to those observed after extended continuous exposure to a palatable diet despite no overall effects on body weight outcomes in most studies.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free