Evidence Hub

Reactive astrogliosis and microgliosis in animal models of focally induced seizures: A systematic review and multivariate multilevel meta-analysis

Asya Egilmez, Shaoyu Yen, Alberto Pauletti, S. Bröer

Epilepsy & Behavior, 2025

Abstract

Reactive astrogliosis and microgliosis are hallmarks of various central nervous system (CNS) diseases, including epilepsy. Both are observed following seizures in various models of epilepsy. We conducted a systematic meta-analysis to synthesize current knowledge on reactive astrogliosis and microgliosis in animal models involving experimentally induced seizures using a multilevel approach to analyze 260 comparisons from 52 studies. Results revealed significant elevations in both astrogliosis (Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) = 1.90, 95 % Confidence Interval (CI): 1.39-2.40) and microgliosis (SMD = 2.02, 95 % CI: 1.39-2.66) with distinct model-specific temporal profiles. Models using chemoconvulsants demonstrated progressive astrocytic activation and pronounced microglial surge during the chronic phase, while electrical stimulation models showed temporally distinct glial activation patterns. Infection models induced acute microglial responses and progressive astrogliosis. Significant methodological heterogeneity was observed, with evidence of publication bias (including inconsistent definitions of seizure phases and limited use of EEG or blinding) and notable effects of a priori power analyses on reported outcomes. These findings provide a framework for understanding model-specific seizures induced glial responses and identify critical methodological considerations for enhancing translational value, including optimal windows for targeted interventions.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free