Evidence Hub

The intervention of cannabinoid receptor in chronic and acute kidney disease animal models: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Zihao Zhao, Qianqian Yan, Junwei Xie, Zhen-Jie Liu, Feng-Xun Liu, Yong Liu, Sijie Zhou, S. Pan et al.

Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome, 2024

8 citations

Abstract

Cannabinoid receptors are components of the endocannabinoid system that affect various physiological functions. We aim to investigate the effect of cannabinoid receptor modulation on kidney disease. PubMed, Web of Science databases, and EMBASE were searched. Articles selection, data extraction and quality assessment were independently performed by two investigators. The SYRCLE’s RoB tool was used to assess the risk of study bias, and pooled SMD using a random-effect model and 95% CIs were calculated. Subgroup analyses were conducted in preselected subgroups, and publication bias was evaluated. We compared the effects of CB1 and CB2 antagonists and/or knockout and agonists and/or genetic regulation on renal function, blood glucose levels, body weight, and pathological damage-related indicators in different models of chronic and acute kidney injury. The blockade or knockout of CB1 could significantly reduce blood urea nitrogen [SMD,− 1.67 (95% CI − 2.27 to − 1.07)], serum creatinine [SMD, − 1.88 (95% CI − 2.91 to − 0.85)], and albuminuria [SMD, − 1.60 (95% CI − 2.16 to − 1.04)] in renal dysfunction animals compared with the control group. The activation of CB2 group could significantly reduce serum creatinine [SMD, − 0.97 (95% CI − 1.83 to − 0.11)] and albuminuria [SMD, − 2.43 (95% CI − 4.63 to − 0.23)] in renal dysfunction animals compared with the control group. The results suggest that targeting cannabinoid receptors, particularly CB1 antagonists and CB2 agonists, can…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free