Evidence Hub

Systematic review and meta-analysis of Staphylococcus aureus at the human-animal-environment Interface in eastern Africa: Prevalence, virulence genes, and antimicrobial resistance profile

M. Fenta, A. B. Bitew, Beruk Demisse, Solomon Lulie Abey, B. Mengistu, M. Kinde, Kalkidan Getnet, Yitayew Demessie et al.

One Health, 2025

10 citations

Abstract

Background Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is a major pathogen affecting humans, animals, and the environment (HAE) and poses a critical global health threat due to its ability to develop antimicrobial resistance (AMR), including methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). Although numerous studies have reported on S. aureus in East Africa, the findings are scattered and vary in methodology, making it difficult to understand regional prevalence, AMR patterns, and virulence profiles. This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizes existing evidence to provide a comprehensive overview, informing regional public health strategies, antimicrobial stewardship, and targeted interventions to control the spread of resistant S. aureus. Methods Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search of major electronic databases (PubMed, African Journals Online, SCOPUS, M-libraries, Web of Science, and HINARI) was conducted for English-language cross-sectional studies published between 2000 and 2024 reporting S. aureus detection at the HAE interface or on occupational equipment in East Africa. Studies meeting predefined inclusion criteria underwent quality assessment using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist. Pooled prevalence rates were calculated using a random-effects model meta-analysis, with heterogeneity assessed via I2 statistics and Cochran's Q test. Publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots and Egger's regression tests. Results From 4748 initial articles, 28 studies…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free