Evidence Hub

Hydroxysafflor yellow A for ischemic heart diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of animal experiments

Tianshi Mao, Kaixin Jiang, Yanting Pang, Yi Pan, Wen-Hao Jia, Qun Gao, Qian Lin

Frontiers in Pharmacology, 2025

7 citations

Abstract

Background Hydroxysafflor yellow A (HSYA) possesses a variety of pharmacological activities which has been demonstrated to be effective against ischemic heart disease (IHD). This study aimed to comprehensively examine the efficacy and summarize the potential mechanisms of HSYA against IHD in animal models. Methods We conducted electronic searches for preclinical studies on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI, SinoMed, Wanfang, and Chinese VIP databases from inception to 31 January 2024. The CAMARADES checklist was chosen to assess the quality of evidence. STATA 14.0 software was utilized to analyze the data. The underlying mechanisms were categorized and summarized. Results Twenty-eight studies involving 686 rodents were included and the mean score of methodology quality was 5.04 (range from 4 to 7). Meta-analysis observed that HSYA could decrease myocardial infarction size (SMD: −2.82, 95%CI: −3.56 to −2.08, p < 0.001) and reduce the levels of biomarkers of myocardial injury including cTnI (SMD: −3.82, 95%CI: −5.20 to −2.44, p < 0.001) and CK-MB (SMD: −2.74, 95%CI: −3.58 to −1.91, p < 0.001). HSYA displayed an improvement in cardiac function indicators including LVEF, LVSP, +dp/dt max and -dp/dt max. Furthermore, HSYA was able to reduce the levels of MDA, TNF-α and IL-6, while increasing SOD and NO levels. Mechanistically, the protective effect of HSYA in alleviating myocardial injury after ischemia may be associated with NLRP3 inflammasome, Bcl-2, Bax,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free