Evidence Hub

Anatomic Basis and Clinical Effect of Selective Dorsal Neurectomy for Patients with Lifelong Premature Ejaculation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Qian Liu, Sen Li, Youpeng Zhang, Yongbiao Cheng, Jiamin Fan, Li Jiang, Shan Li, Yong Tang et al.

The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 2019

96 participants · 42 citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Although guidelines from the American Urological Association and European Association of Urology do not consider surgical treatment for premature ejaculation (PE), the use of selective dorsal neurectomy (SDN) has increased for many years in Asian countries. AIM: To evaluate anatomic basis and clinical effect of SDN in patients with PE in mainland China. METHODS: All of the patients included in the study had redundant foreskin, and they were assigned to 2 groups: group 1, composed of 46 patients with redundant foreskin, and group 2, composed of 96 patients with redundant foreskin and PE. The patients in group 2 were further randomly classified into group 2a (n = 48) and group 2b (n = 48). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The number of dorsal penile nerve branches were compared among group 1, group 2a, and group 2b. Preoperative and postoperative intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT), 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function, Premature Ejaculation Diagnostic Tool, and postoperative complications were compared between group 2a and group 2b. RESULTS: The patients in group 2 had a greater number of dorsal penile nerve branches of 1-2-mm-diameter, ≥2-mm-diameter, and total branches than group 1. The postoperative IELT of group 2a (257.7 ± 205.7 seconds) was longer than that of group 2b (49.3 ± 26.1 seconds). Group 2a had more ejaculation controllability and lower Premature Ejaculation Diagnostic Tool scores than group 2b after the surgery (P <…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 96 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free