Evidence Hub

Umbilical cord mesenchymal stromal cells as critical COVID‐19 adjuvant therapy: A randomized controlled trial

I. H. Dilogo, D. Aditianingsih, Adhrie Sugiarto, Erlina Burhan, Triya Damayanti, P. A. Sitompul, Nina Mariana, R. Antarianto et al.

Stem Cells Translational Medicine, 2021

20 participants · 133 citations

Abstract

One of the main causes of acute respiratory distress syndrome in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) is cytokine storm, although the exact cause is still unknown. Umbilical cord mesenchymal stromal cells (UC‐MSCs) influence proinflammatory T‐helper 2 (Th2) cells to shift to an anti‐inflammatory agent. To investigate efficacy of UC‐MSC administration as adjuvant therapy in critically ill patients with COVID‐19, we conducted a double‐blind, multicentered, randomized controlled trial at four COVID‐19 referral hospitals in Jakarta, Indonesia. This study included 40 randomly allocated critically ill patients with COVID‐19; 20 patients received an intravenous infusion of 1 × 106/kg body weight UC‐MSCs in 100 ml saline (0.9%) solution (SS) and 20 patients received 100 ml 0.9% SS as the control group. All patients received standard therapy. The primary outcome was measured by survival rate and/or length of ventilator usage. The secondary outcome was measured by clinical and laboratory improvement, with serious adverse events. Our study showed the survival rate in the UC‐MSCs group was 2.5 times higher than that in the control group (P = .047), which is 10 patients and 4 patients in the UC‐MSCs and control groups, respectively. In patients with comorbidities, UC‐MSC administration increased the survival rate by 4.5 times compared with controls. The length of stay in the intensive care unit and ventilator usage were not statistically significant, and no adverse events were reported.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 20 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free