Evidence Hub

Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine Guidelines on Evidence-based Recommendations for the Treatment of Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, and Carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Critically Ill Patients: A GRADE-guided Approach

Todi SK, Jagiasi BG, Juneja D, Gopaldas JA, Soni KD, Karanth S, Singh R, Kharbanda M et al.

Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2026

2 citations

Abstract

Background: Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) are major antimicrobial resistance (AMR) threats in Indian intensive care units, with mortality rates often exceeding 40-70%. Despite the clinical burden, there is a lack of standardized treatment guidelines. This study aimed to develop Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE)-based recommendations for managing carbapenem-resistant gram-negative (CRGN) infections in critically ill patients.

Methodology: A systematic review was conducted following the GRADE framework. PubMed was searched through October 2024 for studies comparing polymyxin B/colistin with alternative regimens for CRE, CRAB, and CRPA, and sulbactam-based therapy vs comparators for CRAB. Meta-analyses were performed using RevMan. Evidence of certainty was graded, and recommendations were formulated through structured expert consensus. Outcomes included clinical cure, microbiological eradication, mortality, and adverse events (AEs).

Results: Fifty-two studies were included: 36 evaluating polymyxin/colistin and 16 evaluating sulbactam. For CRE, β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor (BL/BLI) combinations achieved higher cure rates (58.7 vs 48.9%), fewer AEs (10.3 vs 13.3%), and trends toward reduced mortality compared with polymyxin-based regimens, leading to a strong recommendation for non-polymyxin therapy (very low certainty). For CRAB, sulbactam-based regimens,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free