Evidence Hub

Efficacy of Budesonide vs Fluticasone for Initial Treatment of Eosinophilic Esophagitis in a Randomized Controlled Trial

E. Dellon, J. Woosley, Ashley Arrington, Sarah J. Mcgee, Jacquelyn Covington, Susan E. Moist, Jessica H. Gebhart, Alexandra E Tylicki et al.

Gastroenterology, 2019

56 participants · 160 citations

Abstract

Background and Aims: Topical steroid treatments for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) include swallowed fluticasone from a multi-dose inhaler (MDI) or oral viscous budesonide (OVB) slurry, but the two have never been compared. We assessed whether OVB was more effective than MDI for initial treatment of patients with EoE. Methods: In a double-blind, double-dummy trial, patients with a new diagnosis of EoE were randomly assigned to groups given 8 weeks of either OVB (1mg/4mL) twice daily plus a placebo inhaler (n=56) or fluticasone MDI (880 mcg) twice daily plus a placebo slurry (n=55). Primary outcomes were post-treatment maximum eosinophil counts per high-power field (eos/hpf) and a validated dysphagia score (dysphagia symptom questionnaire [DSQ]) at week 8. Secondary outcomes included endoscopic severity (validated EoE endoscopic reference score), histologic response (<15 eos/hpf), and safety. Results: In a modified intention-to-treat analysis, the subjects had baseline peak eosinophil counts of 73 and 77 eos/hpf in the OVB and MDI groups, respectively, and DSQ scores of 11 and 8. Post-treatment eosinophil counts were 15 and 21 in the OVB and MDI groups, respectively (P=.31), with 71% and 64% achieving histologic response (P=.38). DSQ scores were 5 and 4 in the OVB and MDI groups (P=.70). Similar trends were noted for post-treatment total EoE endoscopic reference scores (2 vs 3; P=.06). Esophageal candidiasis developed in 12% of patients receiving OVB and 16% receiving MDI;…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 56 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free